3 ms·
Oh, is your point that YC-funded companies get more coverage on HN than non-YC-funded companies? And that this is bad? There are many reasons why this could be
by zamfi 7y ago
Oh, is your point that YC-funded companies get more coverage on HN than non-YC-funded companies? And that this is bad?
There are many reasons why this could be the case, only one of which is naked self-interest on the part of YC to promote itself somehow. For example, it could also be correlative: YC funds interesting companies; HN covers interesting companies; thus you would expect that HN covers YC companies frequently.
Hipmunk was not just "a failed startup shutting down"; it was founded by a YC alum, as you note, but it was also design-focused with a distinct UX, good at PR, taking a somewhat combative approach in an industry popular on HN, etc., etc.
Most of that 96% of business do not have even one or two of those things?
- speedplane 7y ago> Oh, is your point that YC-funded companies get more coverage on HN than non-YC-funded companies? And that this is bad? In a perfectly fair world, companies would get attention based on the value they are providing to society, not on the level of VC funding or particular affiliations. In particular, labor rights, non-profits, legal technology, and governance are generally under-reported despite their larger potential impact on society, largely because they aren't attractive to VCs looking for out-sized returns on investment.