4 ms·
You need to be very very careful, when parsing things that Craig says. His statement is implying that he is getting access to the "private keys" which would al
by stale2002 7y ago
You need to be very very careful, when parsing things that Craig says.
His statement is implying that he is getting access to the "private keys" which would allow him to actually have control over the 1M fortunate.
But, if you look at what he is actually saying, he is actually only claiming that he is getting access to the "public keys", which is just a list of his supposed holdings.
It is a very weasely way to imply something, and then when people ask to back up your statement with proof, he will go back and say "umm, actually it was this different thing, and I can't show you proof because private keys are not the same as public keys!".
You should expect another excuse soon, as for why he actually can't move his coins.
- tempsy 7y agoIt’s not clear what this encrypted document contains. I agree that nothing matters until he actually signs some message or moves some bitcoin to prove he owns it. Either way BSV has quadrupled in four days, so there are certainly people who are heavily betting something will come of this.
- lozaning 7y agoDude's a real jackass for sure. Either sign any kind of transaction to the chain using Satoshi's private key or GTFO.