Most people's interpretation of Occam's Razor would probably disagree with you. But more importantly- the distinction you are making does not explain anything.

Most people's interpretation of Occam's Razor would probably disagree with you. But more importantly- the distinction you are making does not explain anything. Regardless of whether inorganic matter has experiences, there aren't any observable phenomena that have outcomes that are effected. You can make a claim one way or the other, and the world behaves the same regardless. I tend to fall toward the stance of logical positivism on this one. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logical_positivism https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logical_positivism