5 ms·

Read Bernardo Kastrup's, a Dutch computer scientist and philosopher, criticism on panpsychism: "https://www.bernardokastrup.com/p/papers.html https://www.berna

• mark_l_watson 7y ago
  +1 for Kastrup. I have read two of his books and his reconciling modern physics with spiritualism is in accord with my beliefs. Personally, I believe that our universe and possibly many universes in the multi-verse is teaming with life in many planets. Also, just my personal belief, but I think their is some universal creative force/consciousness.
  • dwnvoted2hell 7y ago
    Why do we vote for things that align with our beliefs? Shouldn't we instead vote for the things that challenge us to better understand the truth regardless of what our personal beliefs happen to be? Not saying your beliefs are wrong, just potentially your actions.
• fjfaase 7y ago
  Joscha Bach has an interesting take on how to combine idealism with materalism. See for example his 'The Ghost in the Machine' talk at 35C3: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e3K5UxWRRuY https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e3K5UxWRRuY
• monktastic1 7y ago
  For some reason I enjoy trying to share intuitions for idealism. Let me try to do so here. First, notice that it's impossible to prove which metaphysics (materialism, idealism, solipsism, Last Thursdayism, simulationism...) is correct. Next, notice that the situation is even worse: you can't even assign probabilities to those possibilities without making assumptions about whatever is "outside" reality -- which are by definition untestable. Now, notice the strong urge to throw your hands up and say "since I can't know, I should just default to the most obvious choice" (which usually ends up being materialism). Avoid this devious trap! It's keeping something hidden. Next, notice the one thing you can be sure about: the present sheer fact of experiencing something. Notice the mind's attempts to explain it. If you introspect carefully enough, you'll discover that thought isn't the most fundamental capacity you have: "pure consciousness" is. Consciousness takes the form of thoughts -- as well as all sensory perceptions -- and shapes itself into the experience you call "me and my life." You discover that thoughts can no more point at consciousness than a mouse pointer can point at the vibrant pixels it's made of (but boy, do they keep trying). And yet, somehow, consciousness can know itself non-dually and im-mediately. At some point, the intellectual knowledge that you cannot assign probabilities to metaphysics finally penetrates your core, and there's a mind-shattering "aha" moment that turns your reality inside-out. Various traditions call this "awakening." You do not awaken. "Reality" or "consciousness" awakens to itself, rediscovering its primordial freedom. Then maybe you go about preaching a philosophy of consciousness-only. Or maybe you just live the best and most loving life you can, knowing that in an impossible-to-communicate sense, we are all the one Love appearing as many.
  • ghthor 7y ago
    I am my beloved and my beloved is I. I am you and you are me.
  • carapace 7y ago
    Well put! Can I quote this?
    • monktastic1 7y ago
      Thanks. Sure, I'd be honored!
  • rjldev 7y ago
    Very nice, your mouse pointer analogy is really good!
    • monktastic1 7y ago
      Thank you!