They are nothinh but flaming corrupt hypocrites. They operate in the business of surveilance yet have the gall to complain about their non-existant right to pri

They are nothinh but flaming corrupt hypocrites. They operate in the business of surveilance yet have the gall to complain about their non-existant right to privacy as an organization? The fact they aren't even citing the subsections hints at specious legal intimidation. The complexity is too high, lawyers are too expensive, and abuses of the law go too unpunished.