4 ms·
yes I meant processes as in the generic term you might say executions as erlang process are different to Java threads. I meant a comparison of concurrent 'activ
by drstrangevibes 16y ago
yes I meant processes as in the generic term you might say executions as erlang process are different to Java threads. I meant a comparison of concurrent 'activities' as comparing a Java thread model to an erlang process model is somewhat pointless. I am interested in any Java program you might have that can run thousands of threads without grinding to a halt. please show me I didn't think it possible!
- runT1ME 16y agoI'm doing simultaneousness processing of 700-800 transactions on my dual core laptop on the JVM. I think on a production grade server a thousand or so is not going to be an issue. Your Garbage Collector and program's contention is going to a bigger scaling bottleneck than the JVM itself.