Here's an "unusual" one I read about recently: > He denied having any ID, claimed he could not remember his Social Security umber, and said his name was “Mr. H

Here's an "unusual" one I read about recently: > He denied having any ID, claimed he could not remember his Social Security umber, and said his name was “Mr. Horrell.” > After police found a photo ID in the vehicle, he claimed the person pictured was his “identical cousin.” --- He was arrested and charged with "privacy invasion and refusal to identify himself". He was acquitted of the former and convicted of the latter -- only to have it later overturned. So, in this particular case, I suppose he won. [0]: https://www.theindianalawyer.com/articles/24168-court-refusal-to-identify-law-applies-to-passengers https://www.theindianalawyer.com/articles/24168-court-refusa...