4 ms·
I would consider open sourcing the tool then selling your time as "the" expert. Resig's never hurting for jQuery consulting work when he wants it, I'm sure. I
by silverlight 16y ago
I would consider open sourcing the tool then selling your time as "the" expert. Resig's never hurting for jQuery consulting work when he wants it, I'm sure.
I wouldn't consider open sourcing it a net negative at all. You will get it out there, and as more "advanced" users start to use it and sing its praises, you will have more than enough to keep yourself busy helping out those who are too pressed for time or just have money to burn, or just can't figure it out on their own.
By not releasing it open source, you will have a much harder time branding yourself as a "proven" performance expert.
Compare these two "resumes":
"Original author and lead developer of the PerfPlus open source project, used by thousands of developers worldwide to benchmark and improve their applications."
vs.
"I'm a new college graduate with a few references and a custom tool I wrote that's worked well in a handful of cases."
I can tell you which one I'd be more willing to hire (if I had money :-)
- tonyarkles 16y agoYeah, this is very true. Probably the route I'm going to go, just need to finish my thesis and clean the code up beyond "academic grade" :)
- aaronblohowiak 16y agoMake it easier to get installed/running rather than cleaning up the code for its own sake. Something working and out there is superior to the alternative.
- tonyarkles 16y agoYes, sorry, that's exactly what I mean about "clean it up". No more 30-step dance to get all the individual pieces up and running :). Right now I'm using "screen" to launch the different pieces and keep them running, and then restart them as I make code changes. The download-build-use cycle is pretty brutal at the moment, but shouldn't take all that much work to get it in better shape.