Well, you could argue that _all_ software applications -- web browsers, word processors, etc, are highly abstracted instances of graphical domain-specific progr

Well, you could argue that _all_ software applications -- web browsers, word processors, etc, are highly abstracted instances of graphical domain-specific programming languages. I actually think this is a useful way to think about things. We _all_ are computer programmers - every single user. We just operate at different levels of abstraction, and use different tools or languages to program the machine. So then, rather than "No Code" vs "Code", it becomes "What is the cost of a higher-level abstraction" vs "What is the cost/benefit of a lower-level abstraction". And if it makes sense to name one level of abstraction "code", and a level above that "not code", then, so be it. [EDIT: I think some useful examples are Sketch, Unity, Pro Tools, Photoshop, etc. Graphical interfaces for users to perform complex operations with a high level of abstraction. I guess I am arguing for, strictly speaking, considering all software user interfaces as highly abstracted DSL's.]