Universality and consensus are not goals I have when seeking the truth. If there is one truth per (willing) mind we might as well call them points of view, no?

Universality and consensus are not goals I have when seeking the truth. If there is one truth per (willing) mind we might as well call them points of view, no? I won't hide that's a big part of what pulled me to mathematics for my college degree: foundational issues notwithstanding, it is the discipline that, at least on some fundamental notions (such as the number 7 being prime), gets closest to universality and consensus. I prefer to ask questions where the answer has real-world implications. You have basically stated that science is more interesting to you than philosophy. We can agree on that, and so can most other people.