3 ms·
I'm pretty sure every hardware maker realize that, but they also realize that is what won last time. Everyone wants to roll their own, but that is a risky ventu
by Kylekramer 16y ago
I'm pretty sure every hardware maker realize that, but they also realize that is what won last time. Everyone wants to roll their own, but that is a risky venture (Palm couldn't hack it). Hitching your wagon to Windows/Android is better than going on your own and failing miserably.
- potatolicious 16y agoIt's that or be sidelined as a commodity hardware manufacturer, though. Despite Samsung, HTC, Moto et al's best efforts (Sense UI and other things they've been tacking onto their Android devices), it's pretty clear that the UX is driven by Google. This handicaps (if not virtually eliminates) their ability to differentiate and brand their products. After all, the only real difference between a Samsung and HTC is hardware - few people care about the custom bits on top. Also, I don't think you give Palm enough credit. webOS is a solid product that had a solid enough launch. If Palm hadn't run out of cash, and their marketing wasn't so ass-backwards, they might've stood a chance. IMHO with a bottomless moneypit like HP backing them, they can put up a real fight.
- bergie 16y agoThe level of differentiation seems to be very small on Android indeed. It looks like almost every week there is the "new hot Android superphone" that reigns supreme, only to be surpassed a week later when the next phone comes out from another Asian manufacturer packing in yet another processor core.