Yes, absolutely. But to hear it explained that way, it just seems like wishful thinking based on a circular reasoning, that invites an invocation of the rule..

Yes, absolutely. But to hear it explained that way, it just seems like wishful thinking based on a circular reasoning, that invites an invocation of the rule... "We spend too much on our developer staff, so in the future we have adopted a strategy where we will avoid most of the things that we need a team of developers for, so that our developers have less work to do, so that we can have fewer expensive devs (of which we know we cannot dispose entirely, [because we are subconsciously aware without them, there is no innovation to speak of at all.])" The problem that "Low Code" or "No Code" addresses is a real one, where devs like myself, (surely not myself, but someone more junior...) confuse poorly architected slipshod solutions for innovative ones. If we could reliably keep our code as simple as it ought to be, the market for tools like this would probably not be as large as it is.