4 ms·
Two reasons I can think of: 1. HTTP/2 was a 'new serialization' of the core HTTP data model. HTTP/3 is too, so since it was ratified it made sense to use HTTP/
by treve 7y ago
Two reasons I can think of:
1. HTTP/2 was a 'new serialization' of the core HTTP data model. HTTP/3 is too, so since it was ratified it made sense to use HTTP/3 to keep things consistent.
2. QUIC still exists, but it's now the underlying framing/messaging protocol on top of UDP. I can imagine future internet protocols being developed on top of QUIC that don't need HTTP/3.
- yeaaaaah 7y agoYup. For example there's a draft proposal for DNS-over-QUIC: https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-huitema-quic-dnsoquic-06.html https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-huitema-quic-dnsoquic-06.htm...