2 ms·
If it’s publishing authentic information, and this impacts voter choice, how is that a negative? This criticism has never made any sense to me, and usually reg
by lawnchair_larry 7y ago
If it’s publishing authentic information, and this impacts voter choice, how is that a negative?
This criticism has never made any sense to me, and usually regresses to a non-sequitur comment like, “they didn’t publish any emails from the Republicans or the Russians”.
If people found out what Hillary’s campaign actually did and said, and decided that this didn’t align with their values in a President, that’s not Putin or Assange’s fault. That’s Hillary’s fault.
- sneak 7y agoNarratives about people’s motivations and goals seem to hold much more weight than the objective facts, which is that he published information that was true, that the public did not have prior.