3 ms·
DSL development is so far behind, that it has been eclipsed by cable. DSL has such a short range of coverage (only works a few miles from a phone exchange facil
by Vrondi 7y ago
DSL development is so far behind, that it has been eclipsed by cable. DSL has such a short range of coverage (only works a few miles from a phone exchange facility), that it never became available to most of the countryside, while cable has become available even in many very rural areas. DSL is also around 10 times slower (or more) than cable here, in most cases.