Another relevant segment of the Philosophy of science article is the realism/anti-realism dichotomy. I find it an interesting line of reasoning that the curren

Another relevant segment of the Philosophy of science article is the realism/anti-realism dichotomy. I find it an interesting line of reasoning that the current lack of progress is due to the default naturalistic approach whose sole purpose is finding "truth" vs. a more pragmatic, non-realist approach that would have a much more concrete purpose (e.g. solving particular problems). Truth for the sake of it with no practical experiments seems to have been a dead end.