3 ms·
So anything that is either used up or that loses value - which is pretty much everything there is apart from very few things that keep their value or increase -
by nosianu 7y ago
So anything that is either used up or that loses value - which is pretty much everything there is apart from very few things that keep their value or increase - would fall under the same argument. That would apply to most loans, and even houses don't have a natural law that their values always remain or increase.
Seems like a lazy and made-up excuse to me rather than an actual reason. I don't mind people making lazy arguments - I mind those that accept them unquestionably and even more lazily (because finding fault in other people's words is far easier) much more, meaning not anyone here specifically, but the fact that that argument could spread so far in the first place.
- pkulak 7y ago> So anything that is either used up or that loses value No, exactly the opposite. This is the one case where the item gained in creating the debt both cannot be recovered (or even destroyed) and still continues to have all of its original value to the owner.