4 ms·
Likely targeting c89, which doesn't have the fixed-size ints (nor size_t, as the sibling suggests).
by earenndil 7y ago
Likely targeting c89, which doesn't have the fixed-size ints (nor size_t, as the sibling suggests).
- ShroudedNight 7y agoMy recollection was that size_t and ptrdiff_t were present in c89. size_t was the type yielded by sizeof. This draft appears to corroborate my recollection: http://port70.net/~nsz/c/c89/c89-draft.html#3.3.3.4 http://port70.net/~nsz/c/c89/c89-draft.html#3.3.3.4