4 ms·
Well, that is a philosophical question. You could’ve used a bus a saved 1000 kids in Africa or you could’ve bought a car and let them die. Same applies for peop
by LaserToy 7y ago
Well, that is a philosophical question. You could’ve used a bus a saved 1000 kids in Africa or you could’ve bought a car and let them die.
Same applies for people in another state or even city. We don’t want to pay for someone’s else cancer treatment.
We just don’t think about it and most of us just don’t care. I did care more when I was younger, but rose glasses tend to fall when you grow up.
I now leaning towards capitalism when I will treat you as bad as the law allows me and extract as much money is possible as it is a fair game.
Welcome to corporate America.
- generalpass 7y ago> Well, that is a philosophical question. You could’ve used a bus a saved 1000 kids in Africa or you could’ve bought a car and let them die. Same applies for people in another state or even city. We don’t want to pay for someone’s else cancer treatment. > We just don’t think about it and most of us just don’t care. I did care more when I was younger, but rose glasses tend to fall when you grow up. I now leaning towards capitalism when I will treat you as bad as the law allows me and extract as much money is possible as it is a fair game. > Welcome to corporate America. Why is it that kids in Africa are going to die but not kids in the U.S.? How has such an incredible disparity in wealth come to be? Isn't the incentive structure of private capital ownership a pretty big part in this?
- LaserToy 7y agoI just took kids in Africa as an example of humans who are very far away and struggling. I find it unacceptable when people say that they respect human life, but what they actually respect is a life of their neighbor. If we say that human life has no cost we should be investing in saving more lives over lives of someone who lives close by. And yes, the structure has everything to do with it.
- generalpass 7y ago> I just took kids in Africa as an example of humans who are very far away and struggling. I find it unacceptable when people say that they respect human life, but what they actually respect is a life of their neighbor. If we say that human life has no cost we should be investing in saving more lives over lives of someone who lives close by. > And yes, the structure has everything to do with it. So, why are those humans over there struggling while the humans over here are not? What lead to this? The humans in the U.S. used to be very poor. How did they grow so rich?
- LaserToy 7y agoexpluatation. What is your point?
- cryoshon 7y ago>Welcome to corporate America. enjoy it while it lasts. there will be more bloodshed soon
- LaserToy 7y agoI don’t enjoy it.that is how the game is played. You either an object of politics (and by politics I mean much more than just government) or you a subject. Here is interesting read for you: Dictator’s handbook. Helped me to finally put the puzzle together.
- lazyjones 7y ago> Welcome to corporate America. What does any of that have to do with "corporate" America? When the Eastern Bloc still existed, people there also bought stuff for themselves when they could afford it, instead of buying more stuff for people starving in Africa, where goods would have been "more productive".