2 ms·
There is a child to caretaker ratio to maintain. And you have to pay for the caretaker wages and benefits, rent, liability insurance, support staff, etc. So tho
by pkaye 7y ago
There is a child to caretaker ratio to maintain. And you have to pay for the caretaker wages and benefits, rent, liability insurance, support staff, etc. So those costs are divided among all who are paying for it. It will not scale any better than that.
- MuffinFlavored 7y agoWhat’s the solution? Don’t have children?
- pkaye 7y agoThe government would have to subsidize it as a cost of keeping society functioning.
- dnissley 7y agoWould that not just directly lead to it swallowing an amount of federal tax revenue proportional to other services that are subsidized? E.g. healthcare/education? And then proceed to munch on GDP bit by bit?
- pkaye 7y agoIt might counterbalance a bit. It might create jobs for people. And having affordable childcare means someone might get back into the workforce and contributing taxes.