> I'd move the lifetime into the `Row` type instead of returning a reference I'm afraid i don't understand; which lifetime, and which returned reference? > Un

> I'd move the lifetime into the `Row` type instead of returning a reference I'm afraid i don't understand; which lifetime, and which returned reference? > Unfortunately you don't totally escape the runtime check, since you still need to check if the column and row come from the same RowSet. True, but at that point it's a programmer error, so at least you can panic rather than returning a Result!