3 ms·
> If you're talking about my point (1) above, the answer to your question is no, because in Pijul, conflicts are resolved by patches, so if a branch has a patch
by frutiger 7y ago
> If you're talking about my point (1) above, the answer to your question is no, because in Pijul, conflicts are resolved by patches, so if a branch has a patch solving a conflict, the conflict cannot come back. So Pijul doesn't need "rerere".
No, that’s not what I was asking. Conflicts don’t come back in git either, if you base the change off the merge-base.
As I said, if the area around the patch has diverged between the release and development branches, you will need to manually resolve the conflict as you merge from the patch branch (based off the merge-base). That’s nothing to do with git, these tools do not have semantic understanding of your business problem so obviously require human input.
My question was, in that case wouldn’t Pujil need assistance too?
Your reply: “conflicts are resolved by patches” - indicates there was a conflict that needed to be resolved by a human or not?
- pmeunier 7y ago> My question was, in that case wouldn’t Pujil need assistance too? > Your reply: “conflicts are resolved by patches” - indicates there was a conflict that needed to be resolved by a human or not? Yes, conflicts need to be resolved by humans indeed (sorry for misunderstanding your question).