3 ms·
If security is something you’re looking for, “Firefox plus some ancient, unmaintained legacy code and patches jammed in by random third parties” is not substant
by smacktoward 7y ago
If security is something you’re looking for, “Firefox plus some ancient, unmaintained legacy code and patches jammed in by random third parties” is not substantially more appealing than just Firefox by itself.
- superkuh 7y agoYour description does not apply to the two examples given. It's obvious you don't even know what they are even if you knew what they were 5 years ago. Look again. Pale Moon and the like aren't just ancient Firefox code. And without all the 'features' Firefox keeps adding in that are irrelevant to a browser that renders html and executes JS they're just as secure.
- samantohermes 7y agoFake news. 1. https://www.palemoon.org/roadmap.shtml https://www.palemoon.org/roadmap.shtml 2. https://www.palemoon.org/releasenotes.shtml https://www.palemoon.org/releasenotes.shtml 3. https://forum.palemoon.org/viewtopic.php?f=65&t=22270 https://forum.palemoon.org/viewtopic.php?f=65&t=22270 4. https://forum.palemoon.org/viewtopic.php?f=65&t=22399 https://forum.palemoon.org/viewtopic.php?f=65&t=22399