3 ms·
It's a horrible abuse of probability, which is not unlike saying that 0*∞ = 100%. Not to say that we can't possibly be living in a simulation, but rather that
by earenndil 7y ago
It's a horrible abuse of probability, which is not unlike saying that 0*∞ = 100%.
Not to say that we can't possibly be living in a simulation, but rather that the only way that can be shown, or even evidenced, is through concrete evidence. Thought experiment is insufficient evidence.