2 ms·
You're arguing the same point in another thread, and we're talking about two different things there too. You're making a moral argument for why it shouldn't be
by ethbro 7y ago
You're arguing the same point in another thread, and we're talking about two different things there too.
You're making a moral argument for why it shouldn't be so. I'm making an ammoral, logical argument for why it should.
- perl4ever 7y agoNo, I wasn't making a moral argument. I was talking about facts as I see them - I don't believe that the US or anyone else will blow up the world in response to being nuked. That is based on my thinking the game theory logic doesn't hold together and never has, but also historical events that indicate it was definitely invalid as of sometime in the 1960s.