4 ms·
First, he just ignores ....very popular right now. Next, he seems to ignore..... many-minds because "physicists agree that there's an external reality" ... So f
by rokhayakebe 18y ago
First, he just ignores ....very popular right now. Next, he seems to ignore..... many-minds because "physicists agree that there's an external reality" ... So for the sake of according with physicists' intuitions,.... doesn't accord with physicists' intuitions
You should applaud him. To discover or innovate you must "ignore" and make "no assumptions" nor "judgements" only make "observations". Only a very few people do this and sadly that is why most discoveries and breakthrough are made by accident.
- lg 18y agoRight... but you shouldn't ignore something that posits fewer entities than your theory yet has the same explanatory power. And you also shouldn't posit something for reason X and then posit something else that undercuts reason X, because that's inconsistent.