What is the point of this article? I've seen it on a few mediums, publications, the morning show. Isn't there a whole set of enthusiasts looking at snapshots o

What is the point of this article? I've seen it on a few mediums, publications, the morning show. Isn't there a whole set of enthusiasts looking at snapshots of the entire sky to see if changes or orbital patterns represent planets or other things for categorization? It just seems like that is being ignored, and its also an aberration to elevate this action as interesting. It has nothing to do with who gets the take credit for it. That's a red herring to the whole discussion. It could have just as easily been another headline about "planet found in habitable range" with a random artist illustration. But honestly, maybe this way is more effective since the PR engine is going on overdrive. Its just weird to read.