3 ms·
If anything, a user friendly git is what we need, not yet another tool with bad UX.
by manojlds 7y ago
If anything, a user friendly git is what we need, not yet another tool with bad UX.
- pmeunier 7y agoThere are lots of tools out there to try and make Git simpler/more user-friendly. There's also Mercurial, which is more user-friendly while still using the same idea. Pijul is meant to model asynchronous work as just that, whereas Git forces it into a unique history. For example, in Pijul, "pull --rebase" and "pull" produce different history, but are guaranteed by design to produce the same result, and strictly equivalent repositories (there's actually just one command for both). This difference is fundamental.
- BlueTemplar 7y agoFossil?