4 ms·
Latest commit from 7 months ago. Also, anecdotally I've heard it's not very user friendly in practice; more like a research prototype than usable software.
by dochtman 7y ago
Latest commit from 7 months ago. Also, anecdotally I've heard it's not very user friendly in practice; more like a research prototype than usable software.
- manojlds 7y agoIf anything, a user friendly git is what we need, not yet another tool with bad UX.
- pmeunier 7y agoThere are lots of tools out there to try and make Git simpler/more user-friendly. There's also Mercurial, which is more user-friendly while still using the same idea. Pijul is meant to model asynchronous work as just that, whereas Git forces it into a unique history. For example, in Pijul, "pull --rebase" and "pull" produce different history, but are guaranteed by design to produce the same result, and strictly equivalent repositories (there's actually just one command for both). This difference is fundamental.
- BlueTemplar 7y agoFossil?
- pmeunier 7y agowould you care to justify a little bit? The latest version is 0.x, are you talking about bugs, or something else?
- yepguy 7y agohttps://discourse.pijul.org/t/is-this-project-still-active-yes-it-is/451 https://discourse.pijul.org/t/is-this-project-still-active-y...