4 ms·
On openwrt I like small utils. As ssh is fine: having a look adhoc who is a bandwith hog, I check with iftop and press "t" to cycle to one-line-sent view and "s
by flas9sd 7y ago
On openwrt I like small utils. As ssh is fine: having a look adhoc who is a bandwith hog, I check with iftop and press "t" to cycle to one-line-sent view and "s" to aggregate to the receiver see https://openwrt.org/docs/guide-user/services/network_monitoring/bwmon#using_iftop https://openwrt.org/docs/guide-user/services/network_monitor... - there's no key yet to toggle per item total amount, but this can be had by using "show-totals" in an .iftoprc file:
line-display: one-line-sent
hide-source: yes
dns-resolution: yes
show-totals: yes
show-bars: yes
use-bytes: yes
sort: 10s
downside is: iftop as far as I know can't filter multiple interfaces, so you'd need to check them separately with -i eth0 / -i wlan0.
If you're mainly concerned about latency, give the package "sqm-scripts" a try. You're sacrificing a bit of bandwith for active queue management. So a VoIP session is not affected by a download.
- nolok 7y agoThanks, that seems to be exactly what I wish ! Already using sqm (and I love it) but it's for use cases like when a laptop that hasn't been used in a while is started by someone to charge before watching a movie and steam/dropbox/windows on said laptop start hogging everything. In a residential area where we're still depending on ~10 Mbps adsl, identifying the device can be a need. > downside is: iftop as far as I know can't filter multiple interfaces, so you'd need to check them separately with -i eth0 / -i wlan0. Since I care only about lan <=> wan, doesn't that mean I just need to check on wan ? And all clients would be there, no matter if they're connected to the router through lan or by wifi ?