4 ms·

Any examples of something that requires disabling SIP in cracked version and not original? Never heard of it, sounds implausible but then I'm hardly up to speed

by htfu 7y ago

Any examples of something that requires disabling SIP in cracked version and not original? Never heard of it, sounds implausible but then I'm hardly up to speed. Like I get swapping dylibs, but not why that'd be best done by poking around in /System rather than the binary.

OzilsAssistant 7y ago
Had a cracked copy of binding of isaac reborn that reuired disabling SIP once, dunno if that was a thing for the legal copy though
thulecitizen 7y ago
Both 'appked' and 'macbed' websites have guides for disabling both Gatekeepr and SIP (now they are derivative websites because the domains keep getting banned/confiscated): macappdownload dot com slash fix-damaged-app-message macappdownload dot com slash how-to-disable-system-integrity-protection-in-macos These guides are all over their websites, especially at the download stage, where there is a short list of 'download instructions' with a link to these guides. A while back I read someone saying that these websites are owned by a Russian hacker network. Touch at your own risk.
- htfu 7y ago
  My question was "Any examples of something that requires disabling SIP in cracked version and not original?", this (while certainly possibly relevant) is not an answer to that.
  - thulecitizen 7y ago
    To me this is an answer. I think somehow you're not understanding what I am implying. These guides I linked to are there because when the software is being installed, it asks for these guides to be applied, to make the apps work. The modifications added to the cracked applications by the crackers take them off Apple's trusted developers list. So the only way to get some of them to work is to disable SIP and GateKeeper. This move then makes the user's computer vulnerable to all malware, because most forget to turn them back on. They also often don't know about the importance of these security features in the first place. I am not concerned for your safety - I trust you will be safe. I am scared for the user I described above. I hope this make it clearer. I won't bother replying to more of your messages until you can show that you've actually tried this all out on a VM, because otherwise we just won't be talking about the same thing.
    - htfu 7y ago
      Off course gatekeeper needs to be off once something doesn't have a valid signature. But SIP protects /System, NVRAM, kext loading and some additional stuff. Not user app signatures. Hence my question.

by htfu 7y ago

OzilsAssistant 7y ago

Had a cracked copy of binding of isaac reborn that reuired disabling SIP once, dunno if that was a thing for the legal copy though

thulecitizen 7y ago

Both 'appked' and 'macbed' websites have guides for disabling both Gatekeepr and SIP (now they are derivative websites because the domains keep getting banned/confiscated): macappdownload dot com slash fix-damaged-app-message macappdownload dot com slash how-to-disable-system-integrity-protection-in-macos These guides are all over their websites, especially at the download stage, where there is a short list of 'download instructions' with a link to these guides. A while back I read someone saying that these websites are owned by a Russian hacker network. Touch at your own risk.

htfu 7y ago
My question was "Any examples of something that requires disabling SIP in cracked version and not original?", this (while certainly possibly relevant) is not an answer to that.
- thulecitizen 7y ago
  To me this is an answer. I think somehow you're not understanding what I am implying. These guides I linked to are there because when the software is being installed, it asks for these guides to be applied, to make the apps work. The modifications added to the cracked applications by the crackers take them off Apple's trusted developers list. So the only way to get some of them to work is to disable SIP and GateKeeper. This move then makes the user's computer vulnerable to all malware, because most forget to turn them back on. They also often don't know about the importance of these security features in the first place. I am not concerned for your safety - I trust you will be safe. I am scared for the user I described above. I hope this make it clearer. I won't bother replying to more of your messages until you can show that you've actually tried this all out on a VM, because otherwise we just won't be talking about the same thing.
  - htfu 7y ago
    Off course gatekeeper needs to be off once something doesn't have a valid signature. But SIP protects /System, NVRAM, kext loading and some additional stuff. Not user app signatures. Hence my question.