4 ms·

I have a Vampire 2 Card for My A600. I can do quite a lot of more modern tasks on the machine and connect it to a modern monitor. In my A1200 I have 16GB of sto

I have a Vampire 2 Card for My A600. I can do quite a lot of more modern tasks on the machine and connect it to a modern monitor. In my A1200 I have 16GB of storage on a CF card, VGA / DVI and a Music card (I can play back MP3s etc. So it like using a Pentium Era computer. The OS is pretty decent considering its age and there are plenty of decent applications to use. I don't find 8bit computers particularly interesting. I had a BBC Micro and a Tantung Einstein (hand me downs) and they are extremely primitive compared to the Amiga. The Amiga is very much like a modern computer. I really wish there was Amiga OS for a PC computer (I believe MorphOS is being ported) as even the aging OS 3.1 with some extensions is in some ways better than Desktop Linux. But that is highly subjective.

ChickeNES 7y ago
> even the aging OS 3.1 with some extensions is in some ways better than Desktop Linux. What do you find better? I'm curious
- uncle_j 7y ago
  For example: https://wiki.amigaos.net/wiki/Intuition_Screens https://wiki.amigaos.net/wiki/Intuition_Screens Also it is just a decent desktop OS. One of the problems with Linux (and OpenBSD / FreeBSD etc) is that the OS really isn't a desktop Operating System. It is a Unix operating system with a desktop.
- burntoutfire 7y ago
  I haven't used it myself, but I've read that many Amiga third-party desktop software exposed an API to be programmed via a scripting language (called ARexx). You could easily automate tasks that cross application boundaries this way.
klez 7y ago
> I really wish there was Amiga OS for a PC computer Never used it (neither did I use MorphOS) but doesn't AROS fit the bill?
vidarh 7y ago
> I really wish there was Amiga OS for a PC computer AROS runs both hosted on top of Linux, and natively, on PCs. Some people also run UAE and run real AmigaOS...
- uncle_j 7y ago
  I use Amiga OS on WinUAE to install it on real hardware. AROS on top of Linux for me is missing the point as a OS enthusiast. AROS is okay, but MorphOS (which I run on a G4 cube) is much better IMO.
  - vidarh 7y ago
    You don't need to run AROS on Linux. It's one option among many, including running bare metal on a number of hardware platforms, including on real Amiga hardware. But for someone who wants to just run an AmigaOS-like OS, it's a convenient option as it makes it irrelevant whether AROS supports your underlying hardware as long as Linux does, and so makes it easy to install; it also makes it easy to run it alongside a regular Linux desktop for someone who doesn't want to just run an AmigaOS-like OS, which frankly still has lots of limitations. MorphOS to me is to divorced from AmigaOS to be particularly interesting, and the fact it isn't open source is another dealbreaker.
    - uncle_j 7y ago
      > You don't need to run AROS on Linux. It's one option among many, including running bare metal on a number of hardware platforms, including on real Amiga hardware. Yep. I did have AROS running on a real machine (which has died). I have a real Amiga though so I rather use Amiga OS. > But for someone who wants to just run an AmigaOS-like OS, it's a convenient option as it makes it irrelevant whether AROS supports your underlying hardware as long as Linux does, and so makes it easy to install; Yes I am aware. I don't like Linux. > it also makes it easy to run it alongside a regular Linux desktop for someone who doesn't want to just run an AmigaOS-like OS, which frankly still has lots of limitations. I just don't see the point of running Linux with a Amiga like DE (which is really what you are doing). I am sure it suits many people's needs. It just not something I am interested in. > MorphOS to me is to divorced from AmigaOS to be particularly interesting, and the fact it isn't open source is another dealbreaker. Not everything has to be open source.

ChickeNES 7y ago

> even the aging OS 3.1 with some extensions is in some ways better than Desktop Linux. What do you find better? I'm curious

uncle_j 7y ago
For example: https://wiki.amigaos.net/wiki/Intuition_Screens https://wiki.amigaos.net/wiki/Intuition_Screens Also it is just a decent desktop OS. One of the problems with Linux (and OpenBSD / FreeBSD etc) is that the OS really isn't a desktop Operating System. It is a Unix operating system with a desktop.
burntoutfire 7y ago
I haven't used it myself, but I've read that many Amiga third-party desktop software exposed an API to be programmed via a scripting language (called ARexx). You could easily automate tasks that cross application boundaries this way.

klez 7y ago

> I really wish there was Amiga OS for a PC computer Never used it (neither did I use MorphOS) but doesn't AROS fit the bill?

vidarh 7y ago

> I really wish there was Amiga OS for a PC computer AROS runs both hosted on top of Linux, and natively, on PCs. Some people also run UAE and run real AmigaOS...

uncle_j 7y ago
I use Amiga OS on WinUAE to install it on real hardware. AROS on top of Linux for me is missing the point as a OS enthusiast. AROS is okay, but MorphOS (which I run on a G4 cube) is much better IMO.
- vidarh 7y ago
  You don't need to run AROS on Linux. It's one option among many, including running bare metal on a number of hardware platforms, including on real Amiga hardware. But for someone who wants to just run an AmigaOS-like OS, it's a convenient option as it makes it irrelevant whether AROS supports your underlying hardware as long as Linux does, and so makes it easy to install; it also makes it easy to run it alongside a regular Linux desktop for someone who doesn't want to just run an AmigaOS-like OS, which frankly still has lots of limitations. MorphOS to me is to divorced from AmigaOS to be particularly interesting, and the fact it isn't open source is another dealbreaker.
  - uncle_j 7y ago
    > You don't need to run AROS on Linux. It's one option among many, including running bare metal on a number of hardware platforms, including on real Amiga hardware. Yep. I did have AROS running on a real machine (which has died). I have a real Amiga though so I rather use Amiga OS. > But for someone who wants to just run an AmigaOS-like OS, it's a convenient option as it makes it irrelevant whether AROS supports your underlying hardware as long as Linux does, and so makes it easy to install; Yes I am aware. I don't like Linux. > it also makes it easy to run it alongside a regular Linux desktop for someone who doesn't want to just run an AmigaOS-like OS, which frankly still has lots of limitations. I just don't see the point of running Linux with a Amiga like DE (which is really what you are doing). I am sure it suits many people's needs. It just not something I am interested in. > MorphOS to me is to divorced from AmigaOS to be particularly interesting, and the fact it isn't open source is another dealbreaker. Not everything has to be open source.