3 ms·
Maybe, but that's also not generosity with expected reciprocity. That's just buying something.
by reroute1 7y ago
Maybe, but that's also not generosity with expected reciprocity. That's just buying something.
- philipov 7y ago> That's just buying something. Exactly. Don't look to billionaires to inform yourself about how generosity works; they live in a completely different world.
- reroute1 7y agoOK, so you've shown that sometimes billionaires donations are buying things and not really donations. But that certainly does not account for ALL billionaire donations. My argument was about RECIPROCITY, which in the billionaire example is not possible regardless of their motives. Even if some are just buying things, there's absolutely no way that every single large donation was given to buy something like a name on a building. There are countless examples of anonymous donors. Because the idea that all generosity has expected reciprocity is silly and completely unprovable. You would have to change the definition of reciprocity to include any feeling or personal satisfaction, which is completely unknowable. You could never actually prove what that donors intentions were or how they felt after, even if you think you know. And even if you could that would be a huge stretch of an argument for " expected reciprocity" and not what I was implying by the billionaire example.