3 ms·
I'm not sure why you're getting downvoted so much. Acceleration that is too slow can be very dangerous (my old girlfriend had a junker that couldn't get up to s
by trophycase 7y ago
I'm not sure why you're getting downvoted so much. Acceleration that is too slow can be very dangerous (my old girlfriend had a junker that couldn't get up to speed quickly and almost got rear ended a few times) and also disruptive to the flow of traffic. The more efficiently a car can flow through lanes (i.e. merging farther left on the highway without having the next car have to brake for you) can reduce traffic.
- Hamuko 7y agoBecause it's completely ridiculous to think that a 0-100 km/h in 9 seconds is dangerous. I'd be able to safely merge with a 1992 200E, which does 0-100 in like 18 seconds.
- perl4ever 7y agoWhat do you do about the delivery trucks? The tour buses? The semi trailers hauling backhoes? Are you looking forward to a brave new world in which all of them do 0-60 in 5 seconds? When I was a kid Porsche made a car that did 0-60 in ten seconds. And Suzuki I think bragged about how their hatchback could do it in 8 or 9 and compared themselves to Porsche.