> They're not exactly making use of it for "good". Depending on your definitions of "exactly" and "good". I think a better question is something like: might i

> They're not exactly making use of it for "good". Depending on your definitions of "exactly" and "good". I think a better question is something like: might it plausibly result in a net better outcome than some/all alternative approaches? I would say the answer to that question is definitely yes.