3 ms·
>It is not general purpose crypto strength This made me curious. Is it because at this stage it is a proposal that has not yet been verified/analysed or are th
by mr__y 7y ago
>It is not general purpose crypto strength
This made me curious. Is it because at this stage it is a proposal that has not yet been verified/analysed or are there actual reasons that you know of that make this not "general purpose strong"?
- NohatCoder 7y agoI don't actually have proof that it isn't crypto strength. But comparing it to other algorithms that have been broken, it seems unlikely that it would hold given the rather modest amount of computation done. I do believe that it meets the requirements for being a MAC function, and I'm completely certain that it is a great non-cryptographic hash function.