2 ms·
Well the argument was whether one can do reasonably as well without Facebook. So the point is there are quite many inconveniences caused by that. This is why it
by mewpmewp2 7y ago
Well the argument was whether one can do reasonably as well without Facebook. So the point is there are quite many inconveniences caused by that. This is why it would be preferable that Facebook was regulated properly.
It is not as simple as asking to send an SMS. I will be missing out on a lot of information, bonding opportunities, picture sharing and I will be that annoying dude making others jump through extra hoops as well.
I am personally not going to make that sacrifice.
I could also live in complete isolation in the woods and without friends. I just do not want to live like that being constantly paranoid.
- root_axis 7y agoIncoveninece is the price of change. > It is not as simple as asking to send an SMS It is. Inform your friends that you don't use Facebook and ask them to treat you the same way they would treat any other friend that doesn't use Facebook: reach out and communicate through any of the other myriad ways available to everyone. > I am personally not going to make that sacrifice. That's fine, but any objections you have to Facebook's behavior ring hollow since you recognize the problem but are unwilling to do anything about it. You are thus part of the problem. > I could also live in complete isolation in the woods and without friends Silly hyperbole. This is not the end result of not using Facebook.
- mewpmewp2 7y agoI can still object and demand government to do something about that. This is my legal right. If I quit Facebook it is not going to solve the problem on a higher level except alienate me from other people. This is not a silly hyperbole. It would be a solution to avoid sharing your data with anyone. There are also other entities that could abuse your data. SMS might not be the safest thing either.