4 ms·

I wasn't trying to interpret existing law, I was expressing my opinion on how the process _should_ work. No one should be denied access to legal documentation

I wasn't trying to interpret existing law, I was expressing my opinion on how the process _should_ work. No one should be denied access to legal documentation that they could be held liable for compliance/non-compliance. I'd argue even further and say that if any portion of the law or any supporting documentation is not fully accessible at any time, there should be no liability for non-compliance.

posterboy 7y ago
While I understand your approach, taking itvto the extreme it sounds to the lawmaker a little bit like: I didn't wear a helmet, you have any whatbthese things cost? I'm not going to get my car checked, unless you pay for it (it's my understanding frequent check-ups are not in fact mandatory in the US anyway). I didn't pay for this car, why would I? I'm joking of course. What was the problem, MTA maps? Yeah, those are publicly accessable.