3 ms·
It's anti-competitive because they're using a monopoly in one area to gain a competitive advantage in another area. Bell's IPTV service would not be subject to
by forensic 16y ago
It's anti-competitive because they're using a monopoly in one area to gain a competitive advantage in another area.
Bell's IPTV service would not be subject to the UBB pricing while Netflix would be.
- ataggart 16y ago>they're using a monopoly in one area Then it would be the regulations granting monopoly that are anti-competitive. Again, removing restrictions on extant and would-be competitors cannot be anti-competitive; words mean things.