4 ms·
That's definitely not what the implication of the article is. Many would read this and think, well, we should just put the homeless people into those vacant hom
by isoskeles 7y ago
That's definitely not what the implication of the article is. Many would read this and think, well, we should just put the homeless people into those vacant homes!
- ianleeclark 7y ago> Many would read this and think, well, we should just put the homeless people into those vacant homes! Decommodifying housing sounds like a good idea. People in the streets sounds like a bad idea
- isoskeles 7y agoThey're not in the streets just because housing costs money.
- ianleeclark 7y agoMaybe you're right, maybe they all just living in tents outside where they are completely ostracized from society and treated subhuman. Maybe they like not being able to do anything that requires an address to do. Maybe they like not having a consistent place to shower. It's a ridiculous thing you've said.
- rayvd 7y agoDarn that Takings Clause...