3 ms·
Their numbers look sound to me. Did you read the article? >The ten most populous Bay Area cities listed above have a combined point-in-time homeless total of 6
by cf141q5325 7y ago
Their numbers look sound to me. Did you read the article?
>The ten most populous Bay Area cities listed above have a combined point-in-time homeless total of 63,527, and, margins of error notwithstanding, a census-estimated 92,800-plus homes vacant, a ratio of about three units for every two persons.
>The census’ annual American Communities Survey defines a home as vacant if there is either no occupant or a temporary occupant—temporary meaning “people who will be there for two months or less.”
>Vacancy rates are estimated by in-person visits to properties or by interviews via mail, email, or phone. The upcoming 2020 census will employ more exact methods and should result in housing and vacancy estimates with less room for error.
- TacticalTable 7y agoIt doesn't seem they're questioning the data, they're questioning the motives of the title, and the implication that the housing should be redistributed to the homeless. I absolutely disagree with their position, but I can see their point of view. Personally, my (rough) idea would be to increase property taxes dramatically for unoccupied residences, which would encourage them to be put on the market for rental at least, and drive prices down a bit.