3 ms·

When was the last time Apple entered a new product space without having something fundamentally different to offer? The Xserve is the only recent example I can

by Bud 16y ago

When was the last time Apple entered a new product space without having something fundamentally different to offer? The Xserve is the only recent example I can think of, and they discontinued that product recently. I'd be surprised if Apple makes a TV.

gojomo 16y ago
There were digital music players before the iPod – and despite some initial evaluations that the iPod added nothing different, it turns out it did, when considering the whole product and ecosystem. There were smartphones before the iPhone that seemed similar (or even better) in specs/features. There were tablets before the iPad. Apple in entertainment takes old categories and adds a new product/platform that excels along some evaluative dimension(s) that people weren't even previously conscious of – not by simply outdoing the incumbents in the same-old dimensions. I think there are plenty of ways an iOS/iTV could break the old moulds. Adding basic integration with the iOS ecosystem – docking ports, media sync/backup, iTunes purchases, handhelds as remotes/controllers for big-screen content and games, Facetime – would be plenty to excite the gotta-have-it Apple households for a successful v1 release. Throw in new voice/gestural controls (as with Kinect) and app APIs that work with live and recorded TV programs – including iAds targeted to individual households. ("This episode is available for $1.99, or with 3 customized-for-you commercials.") That'd be a new platform for digital TV, bound to Apple/iOS – "fundamentally different" enough for me!
- greendestiny 16y ago
  The possible disruptor is the Kinect, but Apple are going to have a hell of a time getting into that space, this is Microsoft's big chance. I think Apple are going to stay away from it and instead of pushing computing on a far away screen they are going to do everything to put screens in peoples hands and on their laps. The Apple TV will continue as a way to put your iOS content up on a TV screen (maybe including things like games), but I don't think they'll push an iOS TV Screen device as a big thing on its own.

by Bud 16y ago

gojomo 16y ago

There were digital music players before the iPod – and despite some initial evaluations that the iPod added nothing different, it turns out it did, when considering the whole product and ecosystem. There were smartphones before the iPhone that seemed similar (or even better) in specs/features. There were tablets before the iPad. Apple in entertainment takes old categories and adds a new product/platform that excels along some evaluative dimension(s) that people weren't even previously conscious of – not by simply outdoing the incumbents in the same-old dimensions. I think there are plenty of ways an iOS/iTV could break the old moulds. Adding basic integration with the iOS ecosystem – docking ports, media sync/backup, iTunes purchases, handhelds as remotes/controllers for big-screen content and games, Facetime – would be plenty to excite the gotta-have-it Apple households for a successful v1 release. Throw in new voice/gestural controls (as with Kinect) and app APIs that work with live and recorded TV programs – including iAds targeted to individual households. ("This episode is available for $1.99, or with 3 customized-for-you commercials.") That'd be a new platform for digital TV, bound to Apple/iOS – "fundamentally different" enough for me!

greendestiny 16y ago
The possible disruptor is the Kinect, but Apple are going to have a hell of a time getting into that space, this is Microsoft's big chance. I think Apple are going to stay away from it and instead of pushing computing on a far away screen they are going to do everything to put screens in peoples hands and on their laps. The Apple TV will continue as a way to put your iOS content up on a TV screen (maybe including things like games), but I don't think they'll push an iOS TV Screen device as a big thing on its own.