> Until such time as its had a full suite of codebase reviews, including multiple independent security audits, I refuse to touch it for production. https://cou

> Until such time as its had a full suite of codebase reviews, including multiple independent security audits, I refuse to touch it for production. https://courses.csail.mit.edu/6.857/2018/project/He-Xu-Xu-WireGuard.pdf https://courses.csail.mit.edu/6.857/2018/project/He-Xu-Xu-Wi... https://www.wireguard.com/papers/wireguard-formal-verification.pdf https://www.wireguard.com/papers/wireguard-formal-verificati... https://www.wireguard.com/papers/dowling-paterson-computational-2018.pdf https://www.wireguard.com/papers/dowling-paterson-computatio... https://www.wireguard.com/papers/lipp-computational-2018.pdf https://www.wireguard.com/papers/lipp-computational-2018.pdf https://www.wireguard.com/papers/kobeissi-bhargavan-noise-explorer-2018.pdf https://www.wireguard.com/papers/kobeissi-bhargavan-noise-ex... Additionally: https://lists.zx2c4.com/pipermail/wireguard/2019-December/004704.html https://lists.zx2c4.com/pipermail/wireguard/2019-December/00... If you use Linux 5.6 when it comes out, you have WireGuard available. The code that's still under "heavy" development? Mostly the clients for other platforms (i.e. Windows).