3 ms·
tried it, pretty neat like other useful rust tools: bat, rg, fd, etc. For this one compared to ranger, here is what I feel to make broot even better. 1. su
by ausjke 7y ago
tried it, pretty neat like other useful rust tools: bat, rg, fd, etc. For this one compared to ranger, here is what I feel to make broot even better.
1. support vim keybindings
2. support editing text files inside the terminal as ranger does
with a quick try i still feel ranger is better, if I missed something that broot has advantages over ranger please let me know.
- capdeck 7y ago> 2. support editing text files inside the terminal as ranger does Can it be configured to just open file in vim or other eidtor? May be in a subshell, so you can return back to broot. Why reinvent the wheel...
- ausjke 7y agoranger uses vi directly inside the terminal, when you quit vi you are back to ranger in the same terminal. ranger is also .git aware. on the other hand, grep/find GNU tools all should be upgraded to ignore .git/node_modules/pip-site-packages by default, and honor .gitignore,etc.