> "so many journalists don't understand that a single article published in a journal does not mean that there is now a scientific consensus around this" I resp

> "so many journalists don't understand that a single article published in a journal does not mean that there is now a scientific consensus around this" I respectfully disagree that journalists don't understand that. They do, they are just incentivized to fill their websites/shows with grabbing headlines to get more ad revenue. It's mainly an incentive problem, not an understanding problem.