4 ms·
I think the key thing they discovered was that it was more effective to pay struggling kids for the activities that lead to better grades than to pay them for t
by mattmcknight 7y ago
I think the key thing they discovered was that it was more effective to pay struggling kids for the activities that lead to better grades than to pay them for the grades themselves.
- throw_away 7y agoMight not be limited to just struggling kids. Might not be limited to just kids. It's interesting to think about what implications this might have for our own, grown up adult incentive mechanisms. Is it such a great idea to gate pretty much everything on results, when a) this is at least partially subject to chance and b) workers might not quite know what to do to achieve those results.