> Protections against unlawful search and seizure and right to privacy are guaranteed by the Constitution US courts have pretty consistently ruled that you don

> Protections against unlawful search and seizure and right to privacy are guaranteed by the Constitution US courts have pretty consistently ruled that you don't have much expectation of privacy for material you handed over to someone else. To the extent that its usually available with just an administrative subpoena. Skipping all forms of due process is probably a step too far-- but a direct court order? After all, if Google can commercially exploit your data including handing it over to partners-- why should a court order result in less access?