3 ms·
1) Because that's a shitty situation to be in for all the women who want to contribute to STEM 2) The current system is notoriously male (especially in VC circl
by HaloZero 7y ago
1) Because that's a shitty situation to be in for all the women who want to contribute to STEM
2) The current system is notoriously male (especially in VC circles), so effectively if you want safe spaces women would somehow have to enter these spaces to secure capital. There's an imbalance at the top that can't be corrected easily but can be changed with time.
- toohotatopic 7y agoEvery rich man leaves a widow behind and with some probability a heiress. There is enough money under female control to start a company with female values. Maybe women don't have access to the top VC circles but likewise many men also don't get access and still continue. The situation is not made for them, but why should that be an issue? It's not necessary that they have the best circumstances. The situation just has to be good enough and I think that's given. There will never be balance at the top, simply because of the higher variance in male iq. The most intelligent humans will always be predominately men. And those men will never create equal opportunities because people thrive for the top to have an advantage. Why give away that advantage when you are there? Some will, but the overall system will be imbalanced. So, why wait for better times instead of making the best out of now?