3 ms·
So it seems like it's just MVS > depth map + recovery of haze characteristics by sampling a color reference at a bunch of distances. That seems blindingly obvio
by andromeduck 7y ago
So it seems like it's just MVS > depth map + recovery of haze characteristics by sampling a color reference at a bunch of distances. That seems blindingly obvious unless I missed something.
- SmellyGeekBoy 7y agoDon't tell me, you could have done it yourself in your basement in a couple of hours? Well done.
- ancarda 7y agoThis is the most Hacker News comment I've seen in a really long time Good job, dude
- flir 7y agoIt's so HN it's almost /.?
- crazygringo 7y agoFirst of all, you're wrong. "It works without a color chart, or any information about the optical qualities or depth of the water body." Secondly, if you think it's "blindingly obvious", read the paper linked in the parent's comment. Even a quick skim will show you're wrong. In conclusion: yes, you missed something.
- moralsupply 7y agoYou missed something: the huge amounts of effort required to make it work and produce acceptable results
- jvagner 7y agoAnd that no one had done it before (apparently).