3 ms·
The economics of nuclear are good but not as good as you're implying. It takes a long time and a lot of money to start earning on a nuclear plant. Given the ri
by xupybd 7y ago
The economics of nuclear are good but not as good as you're implying.
It takes a long time and a lot of money to start earning on a nuclear plant. Given the risks involved it's not that easy to build one.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cbeJIwF1pVY https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cbeJIwF1pVY
I don't think firing nuclear waste into space would be wise either. The risk of that blowing up on launch is high and the fall out from that would be a disaster.
- keanzu 7y agoJust imagine 10 years after you've built your nice new nuclear plant and someone makes a breakthrough on some form of cheap reliable energy. The current development focus on alternative forms of energy makes nuclear high risk purely due to the payoff period.
- crystaldev 7y agoIn the short term nuclear waste should be stored in remote sites on the earth, in the future it should all be moved to space by elevator rather than launch.
- keanzu 7y agoNuclear waste is a non-issue. All of the used fuel ever produced by the commercial nuclear industry since the late 1950s would cover a football field to a depth of less than 10 yards. https://www.nei.org/fundamentals/nuclear-waste https://www.nei.org/fundamentals/nuclear-waste